home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT0301>
- <title>
- Jan. 30, 1989: "I Have A Lot Of Strong Principles"
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Jan. 30, 1989 The Bush Era Begins
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BUSINESS, Page 48
- Boskin: "I Have a Lot of Strong Principles"
- </hdr><body>
- <p> The title suggests a position of great influence: chairman
- of the President's Council of Economic Advisers. In the past few
- Administrations, however, those who held the post tended to wind
- up as voices in the wilderness rather than confidants in the
- Oval Office. But George Bush's choice for the post, Stanford
- University Professor Michael Boskin, 43, is a trusted adviser
- and an open-minded scholar who could help restore genuine
- authority to the job. Says Robert Litan, a senior fellow at the
- Brookings Institution: "For the first time in recent memory,
- the incoming chairman is someone who was deeply involved during
- the campaign."
- </p>
- <p> The personable Boskin was one of the main architects of
- Bush's flexible-freeze plan for cutting the budget deficit
- without raising taxes. To make the freeze work, the Bush team
- would have to limit increases on most domestic spending to the
- inflation rate and at the same time boost economic growth and
- reduce interest rates. Many economists think that combination
- would be quite tricky to arrange. Says Lawrence Summers, a
- Harvard professor and former adviser to Michael Dukakis: "I
- would not want to skate on a flexibly frozen lake."
- </p>
- <p> While Boskin fits into the conservative range of the
- economic spectrum, he is no ideologue. Born in New York City,
- Boskin earned his three degrees at Berkeley. Says he: "I am
- eclectic, but I have a lot of strong principles." His precepts
- center on the belief that "market forces work best, but there
- are situations where they don't work perfectly." Boskin's
- primary concern about the U.S. economy is its low savings and
- investment rate, a problem he attributes partly to the high
- deficits of the Reagan era. The economist concedes that the
- Reagan Administration's tax cuts did not inspire the increased
- saving his research says they should have, but he maintains his
- faith in the incentive power of such policies.
- </p>
- <p> Boskin's most controversial policy preference is reflected
- in his call for changes in programs that in some cases amount to
- handouts for the well-off, including Social Security and
- agricultural subsidies. In his 1987 book, Reagan and the
- Economy, Boskin wrote, "Welfare for the wealthy simply can no
- longer be afforded." But he realizes that middle-class
- entitlement programs are political nitroglycerin, and he has no
- intention of embarrassing Bush by launching a public crusade.
- </p>
- <p> While Boskin seems assured of having Bush's ear, he will
- have to share it with two other, better-known members of the
- President's economic team: Richard Darman, the designated head
- of the Office of Management and Budget, and Nicholas Brady, the
- Treasury Secretary. Darman has already emerged as Bush's chief
- strategist for the coming slugfest with Congress over the
- budget deficit; Brady, a close friend of the President's, has
- staked out Wall Street reform and U.S. competitiveness as his
- turf. But Boskin may hold his own; he has a rapport with the
- President that Darman lacks and more conceptual depth than
- Brady.
- </p>
- <p> Most of his colleagues are pleased that Boskin was selected,
- viewing his appointment as a sign that the Bush Administration
- will be more accessible to outside ideas than its predecessor
- was. Boskin certainly hopes that is the case: "I've always taken
- very seriously the research of all schools of thought. I didn't
- start out presuming they were wrong, because I wasn't wed to one
- camp or another." That sort of thinking should be a boon to the
- Bush Administration as it grapples with deficits and other
- problems that so far have proved too big and intractable for one
- narrow philosophy to solve.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-